Start with the claims users will act on
Extract the concrete instructions, numbers, dates, and policy statements from the answer. Those are the parts that can cause real-world errors.
Prioritize high-impact claims first so review effort maps to risk instead of treating every sentence as equally important.
Check support quality and consistency with context
Verify whether each priority claim has evidence, and confirm that the answer stays aligned with your prompt and context constraints.
If support is missing or context is contradicted, treat the response as untrusted until corrected.
Decide when to allow, review, or block
Use allow for well-supported low-risk answers, review for uncertain or partially supported responses, and block for high-impact unsupported claims.
A clear routing rule keeps correctness checks fast and repeatable under production pressure.